Venus and Phi at
Baalbek
The Sacred Geometry Revealed
Parts I and II
Ahatmose April 14, 2021 07:38PM
I am wondering why these numbers
have never been analyzed before. Is it as is stated in the video
"Is Egyptology a Pseudoscience ?" Is all archaeology a
pseudoscience. I read some of the defense in support of
Egyptologists but not one person could offer any concrete
evidence to dispute the fact that no one has ever moved stones
this large in the present era although the monstrous stone in
Russia is a good defense. Regardless the point I am making is why
are the numbers ignored. Oh they do due diligence in taking the
numbers but then never, I mean never try to analyze those numbers
to see why they were used. The Temple of Jupiter and The Temple
of Bacchus are two great examples. There is another temple there
however and that is next on the agenda. Here is what it looked
like.
And sadly what it look like now.
And what I could find so far on the measurements,
As always I like to start with the pillars as they usually, or at
least have been, yielding some important data. If you have read
the thread then you know the main theme throughout is Phi. Can
this temple show us Phi ? Well I just started and again could not
believe what the numbers showed. However this time it is tempered
with the fact that it seems that, like in Ancient Egypt, the
modern inch seems to fit in where most would say it shouldn't.
However I will just post what i have found.
The columns are 65 centimeters from the wall and each column i s8
meters high and 3 meters in diameter. On the surface not much
there but wait.
8 meters is 314.96 inches and Pi x 100 is 314.16 so could the
column have been 314.16 inches and actually be 7.98 meters ?
The diameter is also very interesting and it states that it is 3
meters. Again not much there on the surface but 3 meters is
118.11 inches and interestingly, and tying in with all the other
measurements we have found for the other two temples we find that
1 / Phi or .618033988 x 1000 and then minus 500 gives us 118.034.
So could the diameter be 118.034 inches or 2.998 meters ? Again
and again I keep trying to state that The Ancients would never,
never have built these amazing structures if they were not super
important to them and tied in to their beliefs.
Why oh why are the numbers continually ignored ? My analysis at
Baalbek may be flawed, might even be completely wrong BUT
AT LEAST I TRIED TO FIND AN ANSWER FOR BUILDING THIS MASSIVE
TEMPLE.. What have archaeologists
done in this regards to the numbers ?
.All Things Are Number ... Pythagoras
Since Venus is often related to
The Pentagram since it scribes a pentagram in the sky I thought I
would try this ...
and finally this beauty ...
and this ...
Geometry has it's rewards ... and how The Ancients knew this !