All Roads Lead To Giza
The final solution on a lifetime quest to find
The God Phi

Ahatmose April 19, 2021 10:05AM

So there I was lying in bed last night at around 2:30 AM mulling over the fact that the dimensions of The Parthenon were in the ratio of 4 to 9 when I remembered (well I never really ever forget) that the ratio of G2 on the allegedly fictitious Giza Rectangle was also in this same ratio. It was supposedly 4/11ths of the height and 4/9ths of the width. Not wanting to get up at that hour I made a quick sketch, so that I wouldn't forget my train of thought, and decided to wait until morning. Here are a few images from that session.

Now I had also wondered, given the apparently perfect symmetry and use of Phi that the angle of the roof had to hold some significance. I put off getting my protractor out pending super-imposing the two images, The Giza Rectangle and The Parthenon.

Here is the first image which I knew would fit.



To start off we got this ...





Shall we see how many co-incidences Giza can give us ? Okay let's !

Okay here is another one ...



and another ...



There may be more but I was anxious to take a look at the angle of the roof. This is even more amazing. Hang on to your hats and get ready to throw your books on History, Archeology and Egyptology out with the next trash pick-up. This is totally astounding I really couldn't believe it when it unfolded. It will I would hope put the claims of The Giza Rectangle being a figment of my imagination to bed for good and prove conclusively that the knowledge that The Ancient Greeks had did indeed come from Egypt, ANCIENT, ANCIENT EGYPT !

On with the voyage !

What you are going to witness is as far as I know never been seen before, at least not in about 2500 years. The beauty of this math will stun you into reflective silence as you wonder, as I now do how the devil could all of this knowledge have been lost, ... OR HIDDEN !

As I stated I was anxious to figure out the relevance of the slope angle of the roof of The Parthenon so I decide to super impose an image onto my Giza Rectangle. Here is what unfolded. Now to be clear I did not start out with any preconceived idea of what I would find. I simply drew the lines. The results are for you to ponder and reflect on.

Let us begin the journey ...

This is our template. This is the design that I have insisted for over 20 years is where all the answers are to be found. Maybe I was right ... you be the judge. You have already seen some starting co-incidences ... well that was just a warm up.



The evidence ... exhibit #1



So now let's super-impose the two images... hold onto your hats ..



On the surface there doesn't seem to be a lot here but get ready as we draw some lines ...

What we are going to do is draw a horizontal line lining up with the north side of G2 and then extending the slope angle of the roof of The Parthenon ... such fun this geometry.



As you can see unbelievably the slope angle hits the north side of G2 perfectly ... and the peak of the roof is in line with the center of G2 I mean really ... what are the odds of this happening by chance ?

But it gets better ...

What we are going to do now is draw the diagonals of The Giza Rectangle to get this configuration ..



A perfect fit and if you will notice there is another exact duplicate of The Parthenon above the one we see but facing downwards ... As Above ... So Below ???

There is no longer any doubt that the geometry of The Giza Plateau and The Giza Rectangle is real and that it holds a deeply religious significance as proven by The Ancient Greeks who duplicated it exactly !

Wonderful ... As I said this is proof beyond argument that the knowledge of geometry and many other things were a gift To The Ancient Greeks from Egypt, ... and A GIFT FROM THE GODS !

Co-incidence ? In a pig's eye !

And so we can now conclude and compute the height of the Parthenon from The Giza Rectangle and we find that it is precisely 5.5 units. And if 4 units is equal to 1600 Greek Fingers then 5.5 is equal to 1600 / 4 then times 5.5 to give us .. precisely the height of The Parthenon as 2200 GREEK FINGERS AND 10 TIMES 1/2 THE BASE OF THE GREAT PYRAMID IN A 10 GREEK DIGIT TO ONE CUBIT RATIO . Nice ! ... I wonder where I am going to find ... 7.0 ?

And please note that 2200 Greek fingers is equal to ... wait for it ... 137.5 feet .. and where have we seen that before ? Isn't that 1/2 the height of The Pyramid at Meidum ? So thus the height of The Giza Rectangle can be suggested to equal The Height of The Pyramid of Meidum or 275 feet but more amazing is that the height of The Giza Rectangle can be show to equal 2 x 2200 Greek Fingers or 4400 Greek Fingers and the base of G1 of 440 cubits in the same earlier 10 to 1 ratio.

And if height of The Giza Rectangle is said to be 4400 Greek fingers and we have used this 11 by 9 many times in the past we find that 4400 / 11 then times 9 is equal to 3600 Greek Digits THE EXACT SIZE OF THE BASE OF THE PARTHENON IN GREEK FINGERS and precisely what all our diagrams are showing

Beyond Mind boggling !

db

The Tholos



[en.wikipedia.org]

and explained ...



Pretty simple when you know what to look for ...



db

For those of you who have followed my relentless pursuit of the proof of Giza and especially Phi you might remember this diagram I did from about Saturday, November 21, 2015, 8:53:24 AM but I am pretty sure it is a copy of an earlier one I did. It and the earlier one I did I offered the opinion that The Sphinx was on what I called "The Phi Line" that is a line that divided the Giza plateau into 1 and 1.618034. It was ridiculed back then but I think the times of ridiculing are about to come to a screeching halt.

The Image:



Here are a few other images I did to emphasize the point that I felt The Sphinx was on The Phi Line. So one could assume that The Secret of The Sphinx was The Secret of The Gods and that was simply that life is Phi and with the small Ka that was part of The Sphinx it was showing us the double phi and The Proof of The Sign of The Gods.







The brain freeze I had earleir was forgetting that the roof of The Parthenon did not begin at the south side of G2 but was a little higher up. I contend that the roof of The Parthenon, that is where the slope begins is on none other than The Phi Line and is situated at, 4400 (Greek fingers) divided by Phi or 1.618034 and we find that the base on the roof is at 2719.35 Greek Fingers DOWN FROM THE TOP OF 4400 and also on our Giza Rectangle it is The Phi Line and the center line of The Sphinx.and is very close to the mathematical constant e or 2.71828 and also very close to The Megalithic Yard of 2.7207. So top of Parthenon should be at 2719.35 Greek Fingers or 169.96 feet or 51.80 meters and UP FROM SOUTH IS 1608.36 Greek Fingers
Just a reminder of where we are ...



And the final solution as it was intended to be ...



Full size image [imagizer.imageshack.com]

Now tell me again how this is all a co-incidence ... yeah right.

Check any scholarly or otherwise book and they will agree that The Parthenon was built to The Goddess Athena. Add to this the fact that Khafre was said to have ruled from 2558-2532 BC and it could be inferred that Khafre built his pyramid, actually a temple to this new planet Venus. Given that The Parthenon uses the dimensions in G2 exactly it would seem to be a reasonable assumption. Thus Athena IS Venus and Khafre was commemorating the first appearance of this planet by building a pyramid, maybe actually a temple.

When Venus first appeared in the skies around 2525 BC, ancient peoples worldwide strove to come to terms with this brilliant and awesome new comet-planet (the best account is in Immanuel Velikovsky, Worlds in Collision, though it has been corrected in a Revised Venus Theory). That meant assigning the deity a gender and a name.

In the Near East, they tried both genders. In its masculine incarnation, Venus became the Bull of Heaven (as Velikovsky pointed out, the comet-planet’s body blocked the sun’s rays from the central portion of its tail and thus it was seen as having two horns). In its feminine version, Venus was called Ishtar or Astarte; and in the Levant Astarte was depicted with serpents in her hands—the twin tails of the comet. In Greece, according to Velikovsky, planet Venus was originally named Athena. He interpreted the myth of her birth from the head of Zeus to mean that Venus had exploded out of Jupiter and headed on a trajectory into the inner solar system that led it to approach Earth at 52-year intervals, causing catastrophes upon especially close approaches. Velikovsky’s views gave rise to a terrific controversy that lasted for 30 years and continues today with diminished intensity and more fruitfulness. Among many points of contention, his argument that Venus emerged from Jupiter encountered the greatest rejection; understandably, it seemed bizarre and contrary to the laws of physics to many scientists, so it helped his critics discredit him and marginalize his supporters.

The Parthenon seems to have been built with an almost zealot like drive to incorporate Phi into it's construction. It is everywhere in every nook and cranny. Can we contemplate why ?

Well Athena who we have seen probably represents Venus and doesn't Venus SCRIBE A PENTAGRAM IN THE SKY ! It is now obvious, at least to me that somehow the ancients knew this fact and that is why Phi became associated with Venus/Athena.

Don't think you will find that bit of wisdom in your text books.